Verification of Precipitation Forecasts over the Western United States

John Horel. University of Utah

Utah Mesonet: Monitoring Weather Conditions in the Intermountain West

Personnel: B. White, M. Splitt (CIMMS), C. Clements
Project began during 1994 with support from COMET. Continued funding from NWS
Surface observations obtained from local, state, and federal agencies and private firms
Considerable interaction with SLC NWSFO to operate and maintain
Deployment of sensors as part of joint project with NWS Western Region and NSSL for high elevation radar project and in support of 2002 Winter Olympics
15 minute processing cycle
Quality control measures in place
Fall 1998: port files into WFO Advanced via LDADS for use at the SLC NWSFO
On-line information: U. Utah, SLC NWSFO
References:

Utah ARPS Data Analysis System (ADAS)

Personnel: S. Lazarus and C. Ciliberti
Develop local analysis at high temporal (1 h) and spatial resolution (2 km)
Provide near real-time high resolution data over the complex terrain of northwes t Utah
Based on the Oklahoma ADAS (ARPS Data Analysis System) developed by the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS)
Incorporation of large-scale and local data:
Summer 1998: Use ADAS to initialize the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) to provide high resolution forecasts of mesoscale events
On-line Information: ADAS
References:

Validation of Operational and Research Models

Personnel: K. Cook, B. McDonald, B. White. Supervision by J. Steenburgh, J. Horel, and J. Paegle respectively
Evaluate forecast skill of operational and research mesoscale models in regions of complex terrain
Focus on validation of precipitation and 3-D circulation
On-line information:
References

Summary: Precipitation Evaluation

Validation of model skill requires attention be placed on the quality and uncertainty contained in observational data sets

In regions of complex terrain, models should be verified on their native grids with minimal postprocessing

Objective skill measures should be consistent with subjective, visual evaluations. The ETS may be misleading in some instances, since overforecasting precipitation is rewarded while slight underforecasting is penalized.

Models that resolve the terrain of the western United States tend to have higher skill during winter for moderate-to-large precipitation totals. Less skill is evident during spring.

Skill for coarse resolution models improves if model precipitation is readjusted across grid squares to conform to monthly PRISM climatology

Forecast skill is higher along West Coast than over Intermountain region